<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Art</title>
    <link>http://random1.blogdrive.com/</link>
    <description>Art</description>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 02:05:03 PDT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>http://www.blogdrive.com</generator>
    <copyright>Copyright 2005.</copyright>
    <item>
      <title>Are There Good Reasons To Think That Creation Science Is or Is Not Science?</title>
      <link>http://random1.blogdrive.com/archive/6.html</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 10:01:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>

As we are to discuss whether Creationism should be given the status of a “science” I shall refer to it as the Creation theory rather than Creation Science. Followers of the Creation theory postulate that all life (animal and plant), the universe and all else that we take to make up our natural world were brought into existence from nothing by special processes conducted by God as stated in the book of Genesis. The foundational belief of the Creation theory is that Genesis is inerrant and that it is a literal representation of how the world was created.

Advocates of the Creation theory also... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://random1.blogdrive.com/comments?id=6</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Was There a Scientific Renaissance?</title>
      <link>http://random1.blogdrive.com/archive/5.html</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:53:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>

The Scientific Renaissance (or scientific revolution) is said to have occurred around the 17th Century. If there was a scientific revolution was it just a general progression of science or was it the sort that sees great upheaval of thought and substantial development of ideas? If it was of the former sort then it was hardly a scientific renaissance. Was there are scientific renaissance? It will be my aim to look at what occurred during the period and discover whether there indeed was a revolution.

The 14th Century saw the beginnings of the artistic Renaissance; this cultural movement saw... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://random1.blogdrive.com/comments?id=5</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is Utilitarianism? What are the main advantages and disadvantages of the Utilitarian position?</title>
      <link>http://random1.blogdrive.com/archive/4.html</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 00:20:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>


There are many moral theories which aim to describe the best way in which we should live our lives. One such theory is that of Utilitarianism. In the discussion that is to follow I will try to clearly outline what utilitarianism is and the main advantages and disadvantages of the utilitarian position. I find the utilitarian position one which has a superficial positive nature but if applied practically would seem to ignore the relevance of human emotion and lack understanding of human interaction and I will aim to show that this is the case.

Utilitarianism is a teleological theory, that... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://random1.blogdrive.com/comments?id=4</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What does it mean to say that some fact is innately known? Does Locke show that nothing is innately known?</title>
      <link>http://random1.blogdrive.com/archive/2.html</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2005 00:10:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>

How we come to know things is a matter which has been debated for centuries. In the discussion that is to follow I will aim to outline what it means to say that some fact is innately known and also discuss whether John Locke in his Essay Concerning Human Understanding shows that nothing is innately known. I find that Locke’s argument stands up well against the principles of innate knowledge however I still find myself unable to reject the concept of innate knowledge totally.

For the sake of this discussion I will refer to those who believe in the principles of innate knowledge as... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://random1.blogdrive.com/comments?id=2</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Censorship and Controversy Surrounding the use of the Human Form in Western Art</title>
      <link>http://random1.blogdrive.com/archive/1.html</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 09:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Click to View My Original Art Piece

Censorship exists in many forms; social, political, cultural, religious and even self censorship. My original art piece is representative of some of these. Censorship is usually indicative of political and social climates. It also allows us to determine what a population deems as acceptable or unacceptable. This applies to art as much as any other form of expression. But why is there a need to censor? Why does the use of the human body attract so much controversy? Why is nudity seen to be obscene? Why is our natural state so offensive? Many unanswered... (more)</description>
      <comments>http://random1.blogdrive.com/comments?id=1</comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
